Orange County Coastkeeper v. Thornton Steel and Iron Works, Inc. et al
| Orange County Coastkeeper |
| Kenneth Dale Thornton and Thornton Steel and Iron Works, Inc. |
| 8:2024cv02027 |
| September 19, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
| John D Early |
| Wesley L Hsu |
| Environmental Matters |
| 33 U.S.C. ยง 1319 Clean Water Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING STAY OF PROCEEDINGS #13 by Judge Wesley L. Hsu. The Court ORDERS as follows: 1. All proceedings in this action, including all formal discovery, hearings, briefings, appearances, and any other deadlines imposed by law or this Court, are stayed until March 6, 2025, to permit the parties to engage in settlement negotiations; 2. The Parties shall file a joint report regarding the status of settlement discussions no later than February 26, 2025; 3. If Defendant Thornton Steel fails to work in good faith to reach a mutually agreeable resolution with Coastkeeper as set forth in this Joint Stipulation Requesting Stay of Proceedings, then Defendant shall be prohibited from subsequently arguing in the litigation brought by Coastkeeper arising from the Notice Letter and Complaint that the litigation is barred by the mootness defense due to actions taken during the period of the stay; 4. Defendant Thornton Steel shall have up to and including March 27, 2025, to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff's Complaint. (lom)
|
| Filing 13 Joint STIPULATION to Stay Case pending Settlement Negotiations filed by Defendant Thornton Steel and Iron Works, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Joint Stipulation Requesting Stay of Proceedings)(Attorney Caroline Louise Plant added to party Thornton Steel and Iron Works, Inc.(pty:dft))(Plant, Caroline) |
| Filing 12 STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO Judge Wesley L. Hsu. (hc) |
| Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Orange County Coastkeeper. upon Thornton Steel and Iron Works, Inc. waiver sent by Plaintiff on 9/27/2024, answer due 11/26/2024. Waiver of Service signed by Corrie Plant. (Spinuzzi, Sarah) |
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Kenneth Dale Thornton. (et) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Thornton Steel and Iron Works, Inc. (et) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Wesley L. Hsu and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (et) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Orange County Coastkeeper. (Barlow, Erin) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Orange County Coastkeeper. (Barlow, Erin) |
| Filing 3 Notice Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Orange County Coastkeeper. (Barlow, Erin) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Orange County Coastkeeper. (Barlow, Erin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-38242999 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff Orange County Coastkeeper. (Attorney Erin Ashton Barlow added to party Orange County Coastkeeper(pty:pla))(Barlow, Erin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
