ECC Property Fund et al v. Church Mutual Insurance Company, S.I.
Eastside Christian Church of Fullerton California and ECC Property Fund |
Church Mutual Insurance Company, S.I. |
8:2024cv02546 |
November 21, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Insurance |
12 U.S.C. ยง 0635 Breach of Insurance Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Corporate Disclosure Statement #3 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by plaintiff ECC Property Fund, Eastside Christian Church of Fullerton California. (Sham, Monica) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiffs ECC Property Fund, Eastside Christian Church of Fullerton California (Sham, Monica) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs ECC Property Fund, Eastside Christian Church of Fullerton California. (Sham, Monica) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-38626784 - Fee: $405, filed by plaintiff ECC Property Fund, Eastside Christian Church of Fullerton California. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B) (Attorney Monica Kim Sham added to party ECC Property Fund(pty:pla), Attorney Monica Kim Sham added to party Eastside Christian Church of Fullerton California(pty:pla))(Sham, Monica) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.