Troy Mario Humphrey v. City of Irvine et al
| Troy Mario Humphrey |
| City of Irvine, Irvine Police Department, Detective Brian Felling, Sergeant Jason Renshaw, Lieutenant Bill Bingham, Glenda L. Vicino, Robert Will, Officer D. Gomi, Sonya Mobley, Kailene Loza, Records Department Does and Does 6-10 |
| 8:2025cv02421 |
| October 27, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
| Stephanie S Christensen |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha and referred to Magistrate Judge Stephanie S. Christensen. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Troy Mario Humphrey. (jtil) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order as to Damages, Injunctive Relief filed by Plaintiff Troy Mario Humphrey. (jtil) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Troy Mario Humphrey against Defendants Bill Bingham, City of Irvine, Brian Felling, D. Gomi, Irvine Police Department, Kailene Loza, Sonya Mobley, Records Department Does, Jason Renshaw, Glenda L. Vicino, Robert Will. Case assigned to Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha and referred to Magistrate Judge Stephanie S. Christensen. (Fee Paid.) (Attachments: #1 CV71) (jtil) Modified on 10/27/2025 (jtil). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.