Williams v. Knowles
Petitioner: Tommy Ray Williams
Respondent: Mike Knowles
Case Number: 1:2003cv05819
Filed: June 16, 2003
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
Presiding Judge: John M. Dixon
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 119 ORDER on Remand Denying Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus with Prejudice; ORDER Directing Clerk of the Court to Enter Judgment and Close the Case; ORDER Declining to Issue Certificate of Appealability, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 12/15/15. CASE CLOSED. (Verduzco, M)
September 21, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 113 STIPULATION and ORDER to Modify Briefing Schedule signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 9/21/2015. (Sant Agata, S)
August 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 111 ORDER GRANTING Respondent's Motion to Withdraw Affirmative Defense of Untimeliness; ORDER Taking Evidentiary Hearing Off Calendar; ORDER SETTING Briefing Schedule on the Merits of the Petition signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 8/21/2015. (Sant Agata, S)
August 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 110 ORDER Requiring Petitioner to File an Opposition or Notice of Non-Opposittion to the 108 Motion to Withdraw the Motion to Dismiss, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 8/19/15. (Martin-Gill, S)
June 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 107 ORDER CONTINUING EVIDENTIARY HEARING,signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 05/29/2015. ( Evidentiary Hearing set for 9/15/2015 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 6 (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston) (Martin-Gill, S)
May 7, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 105 ORDER AFTER Telephonic Conference re: Respondent's Request to Continue the Hearing Date for Evidentiary Hearing, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 5/7/2015. Filing Deadline: 5/29/2015. (Marrujo, C)
April 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 101 ORDER DENYING RESPONDENT'S 100 Motion for Reconsideration of Order Setting Evidentiary Hearing, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 04/06/2015. (Martin-Gill, S)
March 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 99 ORDER Setting Evidentiary Hearing, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 03/05/15. Evidentiary Hearing set for 6/23/2015 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 6 (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. (Gonzalez, R)
February 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 96 ORDER REQUIRING the Parties to File a Supplemental Brief; 10-Day Deadline signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 2/19/2015. (Sant Agata, S)
November 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 91 ORDER Establishing Briefing Schedule for Parties to Address Timeliness Issue FORTY-FIVE DAY DEADLINE, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 11/19/13. (Hellings, J)
February 16, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 82 ORDER DECLINING TO ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Dixon, Jr on 2/16/2011. (Sant Agata, S)
January 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 78 ORDER Granting Motion to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Dixon, Jr on 1/13/11. CASE CLOSED. (Verduzco, M)
May 20, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 76 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Dixon, Jr on 5/20/2010 re 74 Application for extension of time to file response. (Filing Deadline: 6/23/2010).(Lundstrom, T)
March 4, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 70 ORDER REQUIRING Parties to Submit Additional Briefing Regarding the Statute of Limitations; Response Due within Thirty Days signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Dixon, Jr on 3/3/2010. Petitioner's Response due by 4/6/2010. Respondent's Response due within Thirty Days of Receipt of Petitioner's Brief. (Sant Agata, S)
July 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER DIRECTING Payment of Reporter's Fees by United States Marshal signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Dixon, Jr on 7/28/2009. (Sant Agata, S)
July 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER GRANTING Parties' 61 Request for Modification of Briefing Schedule signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Dixon, Jr on 7/14/2009. Petitioner Shall File his Post-Evidentiary Hearing Brief on July 24, 2009; Respondent shall File its Post-Evidentiary Hearing Brief on September 1, 2009. (Sant Agata, S)
May 1, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER Setting Briefing Schedule signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Dixon, Jr on 5/1/2009. (Figueroa, O)
February 9, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 52 Supplement ORDER Scheduling Evidentiary Hearing 51 , signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Dixon, Jr on 2/6/2009. (Joint Statements due by 3/12/2009) (Scrivner, E)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Knowles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Tommy Ray Williams
Represented By: Carolyn D. Phillips
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Mike Knowles
Represented By: Justain Paul Riley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?