Chatman v. Tyner, et al
| Charles James Chatman |
| C Tyner, - Alameida, K W Prunty, John Chen, M. Yarborough, Arthur Calderon, P Vasquez, W Sullivan, D. Winett, M K Witcher, L Stradley, J Lundy, C Fortson, T Traynham, J Mack, Wells, Jimenez, Duran, - Bowman and R Johnson |
| 1:2003cv06636 |
| February 9, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Anthony W. Ishii |
| Sandra M. Snyder |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
211
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Request for Intervention in Enforcing or Voiding the Settlement Agreement within Thirty Days 205 , 206 , signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 3/28/11. (Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
209
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 2/20/2011 requiring Attorney General's Office to file opposition or state of non-opposition to 206 , 205 MOTION /Request for Court's Intervention in Enforcing or Voiding the Settlement Agreement filed by Charles James Chatman. (Filing Deadline: 3/24/2011). (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
204
ORDER DENYING 200 Plaintiff's Motion for Settlement Consent to be Deemed Void signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 7/21/2010. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
197
ORDER VACATING 185 Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum Directing the Production of Plaintiff for Trial on May 18, 2010 at 7:30 a.m. signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 5/17/2010. (Bradley, A)
|
|
Filing
185
ORDER & WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM TO TRANSPORT: CHARLES JAMES CHATMAN, CDC#P-99062, PLAINTIFF on May 18, 2010 at 7:30 A.M., signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 04/16/2010. (Martin, S)
|
|
Filing
184
ORDER SETTING Telephonic Settlement Conference for 4/21/2010 at 01:30 PM before before Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder; order signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 4/14/2010. (Rooney, M)
|
|
Filing
176
ORDER Re Plaintiff's 175 Objection to Stipulation Regarding Deposition of Defendant Duran Via Video Conference, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 3/8/2010. Filing Deadline: 3/17/2010. (Sondheim, M)
|
|
Filing
174
ORDER DENYING 151 Plaintiff's Motion for Settlement Conference signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 2/9/2010. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
173
ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's 153 Motion for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum as to Plaintiff and DENYING Motion as to Inmate Darryle Williams, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 1/8/2010. (Sondheim, M)
|
|
Filing
169
STIPULATION And ORDER Regarding Video Deposition Of Rodrigo Duran Conducted Via Video Conference, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 9/1/2009. (Scrivner, E)
|
|
Filing
162
ORDER VACATING Telephonic Trial Confirmation Hearing and Trial Dates; ORDER GRANTING 158 , 159 Defendants' Requests for Additional Time in Which to File Pretrial Statements; and ORDER CONCERNING Defendant Duran's Testimony re 155 Motion, Signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 7/17/2009. Defendants Shall File their Pretrial Statements by 8/19/2009. This Matter is Set for a Telephonic Hearing on 8/31/2009 at 03:00 PM. (Arellano, S.)
|
|
Filing
136
ORDER GRANTING Defendant Duran's Request for Extension of Time to File a Reply, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 1/6/09: Defendant Duran's Reply ddl EXTENDED to 1/11/09.(Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
106
ORDER GRANTING 105 Motion to Extend Time to File Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment 102 signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 2/6/08. Opposition due by 3/11/2008. (Verduzco, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
