Juarez, et al v. Alameda, et al
| 1:2004cv05668 |
| May 3, 2004 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
140
ORDER DIRECTING Clerk's Office to Send Courtesy Copy of Docket and Second Scheduling Order, Including Attachment of Local Rule 16-281, to Plaintiff at New Address of Record 139 ; ORDER DIRECTING Clerk's Office to Re-Serve Orders 137 and 138 on Plaintiff; and ORDER DENYING Motion for Appointment of Counsel 122 , signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 4/2/09. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
138
ORDER Report of Pro Se Prisoner Early Settlement Proceeding; case did not settle. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nandor J Vadas on 2/18/09. (Masterson, G)
|
|
Filing
137
ORDER DENYING 136 Motion to Appoint Counsel, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 2/13/2009. (Sondheim, M)
|
|
Filing
134
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 1/9/2009, STRIKING 133 Motion for Clarification AS DUPLICATIVE; 129 Motion for Clarification DEEMED ADDRESSED. (Jessen, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Juarez, et al v. Alameda, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
