Holt v. Stockman, et al
| 1:2004cv06073 |
| August 9, 2004 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Oliver W. Wanger |
| William M. Wunderlich |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
200
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 10/19/12 ordering that defendants shall file a response to plaintiff's 10/03/12 motion within 15 days of the date of this order. (cc: CMK) (Plummer, M) Modified on 10/22/2012 (Plummer, M).
|
|
Filing
199
ORDER, signed by District Judge Mary H. Murguia on 10/15/2012. It is ORDERED referring Plaintiff's Motion (Doc. 198 ) to Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison for ruling. (Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
195
ORDER Directing the Clerk of Court to Dismiss This Matter on April 23, 2012, Unless a Stipulation to Dismiss is Filed Prior to the Dismissal Date, signed by District Judge Mary H. Murguia on 4/2/2012. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
191
ORDER GRANTING 190 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum signed by District Judge Mary H. Murguia on 3/13/2012. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
186
ORDER re Settlement Conference, signed by District Judge Mary H. Murguia on 2/8/2012. Settlement Conference set for 3/15/2012 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 2 before Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
184
ORDER Requesting Confidential Statements Re: Case Selection for Prisoner Settlement Program, signed by District Judge Mary H. Murguia on 1/24/2012. Fifteen-Day Deadline. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
182
ORDER on Motions, signed by District Judge Mary H. Murguia on 9/21/2011. Motion 172 is GRANTED; Motions 173 , 174 , 180 & 181 are DENIED. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
165
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 162 Motion for Additional Discovery to Oppose Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; ORDER GRANTING Defendants' 164 Motion for Extension of Time, until May 13, 2011 to File their Reply Brief signed by District Judge Mary H. Murguia on 5/10/2011. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
161
ORDER Denying as Moot Plaintiff's Motion and Request to Amend and Supplement Exhibit "A" of Plaintiff's Reply to Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel 150 ; ORDER Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Ex tension of Time to File the Joint Proposed Pretrial Statement 156 ; ORDER Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to file Opposition to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment 157 ; ORDER granting Plaintiff's Motion to Serve/ (Su pplement) Discovery Responses/Documents on Defendants 158 ; ORDER Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File Revised Motion to Compel 160 , signed by District Judge Mary H. Murguia on 4/4/2011. Oppposition, Revised Motion Deadline: April 22, 2011. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
155
ORDER DENYING without Prejudice Plaintiff's 135 Motion for Order Compelling Discovery; ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's 141 Request (Motion) for a 21-Day Extension of Time to Re-File Motion to Compel; ORDER DENYING AS MOOT Plaintiff's [1 42] Motion and Request for Leave to Supplement Motion to Compel; ORDER DENYING AS MOOT Plaintiff's 143 Motion and Request for Leave to File Response/Reply to Defendant's Opposition to Motion to Compel; ORDER DENYING AS MOOT Plaintiff' ;s 144 Motion for Hearing on his Motion for Order Compelling Discovery; ORDER DENYING AS MOOT Plaintiff's 145 Request (Motion) for Notice on the Court's Calendared Hearing Date on Plaintiff's Motion to Compel and Defendants' Opposition to Motion to Compel; ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 146 Motion and Request to Hold Proceedings in Stay and Abeyance signed by District Judge Mary H. Murguia on 2/18/2011. Revised Motion to Compel due by 3/18/2011. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
134
ORDER signed by District Judge Mary H. Murguia on 9/7/2010 granting 130 Motion for Extension of Court's Rule 16 Scheduling and Discovery Order, amending the discovery and motion deadlines; denying 133 Motion to Compel Discovery and denying 131 Motion for Emergency Injunction / Relief. (Discovery due by 10/25/2010. Dispositive Motions filed by 12/23/2010. Joint Proposed Pretrial Order Lodged by 2/22/2011). (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
129
ORDER granting 128 Motion and Request for a docket sheet and copy of documents signed by District Judge Mary H. Murguia on 7/13/2010. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
126
ORDER, signed by District Judge Mary H. Murguia on 6/1/2010. It is ORDERED denying without prejudice Plaintiff's Motions for Stay and Abeyance. (Doc. # 124 , 125 ) It is Further ORDERED directing Plaintiff to notify the Court immediately upon his return to Lancaster State Prison. (Scrivner, E)
|
|
Filing
123
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT 121 Plaintiff's Motion and Request for Emergency Injunction; ORDER GRANTING 122 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to Comply With the Court's Rule 16 Scheduling and Discovery Order; and ORDER AMENDING the Court's Rule 16 Scheduling and Discovery Order signed by District Judge Mary H. Murguia on 5/11/2010. Discovery due by 8/23/2010. Dispositive Motions filed by 10/23/2010. Joint Proposed Pretrial Order Lodged by 12/22/2010. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
110
ORDER GRANTING 97 Motion to Withdraw Defendants R. Gibson and R. Leon and Request for Leave to Amend; ORDER Dismissing This Action as to Defendants R. Gibson and R. Leon Without Prejudice and Allowing Plaintiff Until January 22, 2010 to Effect Serv ice of Process Upon Them; ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 100 , 101 Requests for Entry of Default Judgment and 102 Motion for Default Judgment by the Court; ORDER DENYING Without Prejudice Plaintiff's 105 , 106 Motions for Temporary Appointment of Legal Representation, signed by District Judge Mary H. Murguia on 11/24/2009. (Sondheim, M)
|
|
Filing
107
ORDER GRANTING 99 Defendants' Motion for Leave to Depose Plaintiff, signed by District Judge Mary H. Murguia on 11/09/2009. (Martin, S)
|
|
Filing
96
ORDER Denying 43 Motion to Dismiss; ORDER Directing the Clerk of the Court to Strike Plaintiff's Response and Opposition to Defendants Reply to Plaintiffs Opposition to Dismiss. (Doc.# 78); ORDER Denying 68 MOTION to AMEND the COMPLAINT; ORDER Denying Plaintiffs 90 Motion for Hearing and Ruling on Plaintiffs Motion/Request to File 3rd Amended Complaint as moot signed by District Judge Mary H. Murguia on 09/23/2009. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
92
ORDER Allowing Defendants W.R. Villareal, M.T. Cisneros, and Mr. Yamamoto 14 Days from the Date of this Order to Join in the 43 Motion to Dismiss, signed by District Judge Mary H. Murguia on 8/20/2009. Filing Deadline: 9/8/2009. (Sondheim, M)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER Signed by District Judge Mary H. Murguia on 2/12/2009. Plaintiff's Motion to Alter/Amend Order Finding Complaint States Claim to Include Defendants the Court Inadvertently Left Out for Service of Process of Summons and Complaint [35 ], 38 is GRANTED; Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time 39 is GRANTED; Clerk of Court DIRECTED to Forward Service Documents to Plaintiff for Completion and Return; Plainiff ORDERED to Return Completed Service Documents to Clerk of Court by 3/23/2009; Upon Receipt of Completed Service Documents from Plaintiff, Clerk of Court DIRECTED to Forward Documents to United States Marshal for Service of Process. (Arellano, S.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Holt v. Stockman, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
