Amesquita v. Hickman
Case Number: 1:2005cv00055
Filed: January 12, 2005
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
Presiding Judge: Theresa A. Goldner
Presiding Judge: Oliver W. Wanger
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER DENYING Frivolous 60 Motion for Relief From and Judgment, signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 7/2/19. (Marrujo, C)
October 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER Granting in Part Petitioner's 58 Motion for Copy of Records, Documents, Papers, Exhibits, and Transcripts, signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 9/28/18. (Marrujo, C)
March 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER Denying 53 Motion for Certificate of Appealability, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/5/18. (Gonzalez, R)
February 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER Regarding 49 Objections to Order Denying Motion for Relief, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/9/18. (Gonzalez, R)
June 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER Denying 43 44 Motions for Resolution of Claims; ORDER Denying 45 Motion for Reconsideration signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 06/20/2017. (Flores, E)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Amesquita v. Hickman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?