Harold Walker v. Vazquez et al
| 1:2005cv00709 |
| June 2, 2005 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
83
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that Defendants' 58 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Exhaust be Granted signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 12/09/2009. Referred to Judge Wanger; Objections to F&R due by 1/12/2010. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER STRIKING 81 Surreply signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 12/8/2009. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER Advising Parties that Discovery has not Commenced in this Action and ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 60 Motion for Discovery and GRANTING Defendant's 68 Motion for Protective Order signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 4/16/2009. (Figueroa, O)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER Granting Defendants' Motion To Extend Time To File A Responsive Pleading 55 , 30-Day Deadline, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 2/12/2009.( Responsive Pleading due by 3/17/2009) (Scrivner, E)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Harold Walker v. Vazquez et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
