Sevilla v. Adams, et al.
Case Number: 1:2006cv00172
Filed: February 16, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
Presiding Judge: Lawrence J. O'Neill
Presiding Judge: William M. Wunderlich
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 82 ORDER DISMISSING Action Based On Plaintiff's Inability To Prosecute, And Directing Clerk Of Court To Enter Judgment Against Plaintiff (Docs. 79 and 80 ), signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 7/15/2011. CASE CLOSED.(Fahrney, E)
July 12, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER Re Payment, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 7/12/2011. (Fahrney, E)
July 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 80 ORDER Granting Attorney William L. Schmidt Twenty Days Within Which To Submit A Request For Cost Reimbursement, If Any, And Relieving Mr. Schmidt As Counsel Of Record For Plaintiff (Docs. 75 and 79 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 7/8/2011. (Filing Deadline: 8/1/2011)(Fahrney, E)
April 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 78 ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 77 Motion to Open Discovery, and Requiring Plaintiff to File Status Report Within Ninety Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 4/5/2011. (Gonzalez, R)
February 16, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 75 ORDER APPOINTING William L. Schmidt to Represent Plaintiff 73 ; ORDER REQUIRING Plaintiff to file status report in ninety days;, Attorney William L Schmidt for Ronald Victor Sevilla added, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 02/15/2011. (Case Management Deadline: 5/19/2011)(Martin, S)
December 3, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDER adopting 71 72 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; dismissing certain claims and defendants from fifth amended complaint and DENYING 69 Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief. Defendants Darrel Adams, Edgar Castillo, Steinberg, Alameida and McKesson are DISMISSED from this action. Signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/2/2010. (Vasquez, J)
September 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 73 ORDER/Notice To Plaintiff That Case Has Been Referred To The Pro Bono Program For The Appointment Of Counsel, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 9/7/2010. (Scrivner, E)
September 7, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 72 FINDINGS And RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending Denial Of Plaintiff's Motion For Preliminary Injunctive Relief (Docs. 69 and 70 ), Objections Due Within Thirty Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 9/7/2010. The Court RECOMMENDS that Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, filed August 2, 2010, be DENIED. F&R's referred to Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill; Objections to F&R due by 10/12/2010. (Scrivner, E)
May 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 68 ORDER Denying Motion For Appointment Of Counsel (Doc. 66 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 5/17/2010. (Scrivner, E)
February 4, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER Denying 57 58 59 Motions signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 02/04/2010. (Flores, E)
July 27, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER DENYING 62 Motion for Appointment of Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 7/27/2009. (Sant Agata, S)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sevilla v. Adams, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?