Mitchell v. Malfi
Case Number: 1:2006cv00387
Filed: May 4, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
Presiding Judge: Anthony W. Ishii
Presiding Judge: William M. Wunderlich
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 5, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY signed by District Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 5/5/2010. (Sant Agata, S)
February 9, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 34 JUDGMENT dated *02/09/2010* pursuant to order, signed by District Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 02/08/2010. (Martin, S)
April 20, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER signed by Judge William M. Wunderlich on 4/20/06 ORDERING Petitioner to file first amended petition in this case naming the correct Respondent. First amended petition due by 5/22/2006. (Carter-Ford, R)
April 18, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Judge William M. Wunderlich on 4/18/06 ORDERING petitioner shall submit a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis, or in the alternative, pay the $5.00 filing fee for this action by 5/22/2006. (Carter-Ford, R)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mitchell v. Malfi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?