Hooker v. Simons et al
1:2006cv00389 |
April 17, 2006 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Lawrence J. O'Neill |
Sandra M. Snyder |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 35 ORDER, signed by Chief Judge John M. Roll on 9/3/2010. Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is GRANTED 24 . CASE CLOSED. (Verduzco, M) |
Filing 33 ORDER GRANTING Defendants' 32 Motion to Stay signed by Chief Judge John M. Roll on 3/1/2010. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 31 ORDER GRANTING 30 Motion to Vacate Pending Deadlines in Scheduling Order, signed by Chief Judge John M. Roll on 2/5/2010. (Sondheim, M) |
Filing 29 ORDER Granting 28 Motion to Extend the Deadline to take Plaintiff's Deposition signed by Chief Judge John M. Roll on 12/15/2009. The Court vacates the deadline for taking Plaintiffs deposition. A new deadline will be set, if necessary, after the Court rules on Defendants pending motion for judgment on the pleadings.(Flores, E) |
Filing 6 FIRST INFORMATIONAL ORDER signed by Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 4/14/06. (Carter-Ford, R) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hooker v. Simons et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.