Coleman v. Adams, et al.
1:2006cv00836 |
June 29, 2006 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Anthony W. Ishii |
William M. Wunderlich |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 125 ORDER Granting Parties STIPULATION For Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice (ECF No. 124 ), signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 2/3/2015. CASE CLOSED.(Fahrney, E) |
Filing 123 ORDER ADOPTING 109 Findings and Recommenation, DISMISSING Defendant Deering From Action, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 12/17/2014. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 119 ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default 114 , signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 7/1/14. (Verduzco, M) |
Filing 110 ORDER Denying Without Prejudice Reimbursment Costs Of U.S. Marshal Personal Service Fees (ECF Nos. 104 , 105 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/22/2014. (Fahrney, E) |
Filing 109 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATION Regarding Dismissal of Defendant Deering (ECF Nos. [27, 90 ) signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/21/2014. F&R's referred to Judge Anthony W. Ishii; Objections to F&R due by 6/26/2014. (Fahrney, E) |
Filing 97 FINDINGS And RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending That Defendants' Motion For Summary Judgment Be GRANTED (ECF No. 70 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A Boone on 2/6/2013. F&R's referred to Judge Anthony W. Ishii; Objections to F&R due by 3/4/2013. (Fahrney, E) |
Filing 90 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Defendant Deering Should Not be Dismissed From This Action re 27 , signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 8/23/12. Response From Plaintiff Due in Thirty Days. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 89 ORDER Granting 83 Plaintiff's Motion to File Opposition Nunc Pro Tunc, signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 8/21/12. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 88 AMENDED SECOND INFORMATIONAL ORDER - Notice and Warning of Requirements for Opposing Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 08/07/2012. (Flores, E) |
Filing 84 ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 73 Motion for Subpoena for Production of Documents, signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 4/13/2012. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 69 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 10/06/2011 granting 68 Motion for extension of discovery. Amended Discovery and Scheduling Order. Dispositive Motions filed by 11/7/2011. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 57 ORDER Denying Motion 40 , signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 9/15/2010. (Verduzco, M) |
Filing 51 ORDER ADOPTING 50 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ORDER DENYING 36 Motion to Dismiss signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 8/5/2010. (Bradley, A) |
Filing 50 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that 36 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss be DENIED re 17 Second Amended Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/21/2010. Referred to Judge Ishii. Objections to F&R due by 7/26/2010. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 13 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge William M. Wunderlich on 2/5/2009, GRANTING 11 Plaintiff's Proposed Changes in Support of Amended Complaint, Construed as a MOTION for LEAVE to AMEND. (Second Amended Complaint due by 3/10/2009). (Jessen, A) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Coleman v. Adams, et al. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.