Wright v. Shapirshtey et al
| 1:2006cv00927 |
| July 19, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Sandra M. Snyder |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
ORDER Denying Motion For Reconsideration (Doc. 25 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 6/25/2014. (Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER DISMISSING FIRST Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a second amended complaint in compliance with this Order signed by District Judge Mary H. Murguia on 2/12/2009. If Plaintiff fails to file a second amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice. ( Amended Complaint due by 3/17/2009) (Figueroa, O)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER advising the parties that the Court is conducting statutory screening. The matter will proceed following the issuance of the statutory screening order signed by District Judge Mary H. Murguia on 01/28/2009. (Flores, E)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wright v. Shapirshtey et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
