Martinez v. Whitman et al
1:2006cv01074 |
August 15, 2006 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Lawrence J. O'Neill |
William M. Wunderlich |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 50 ORDER ADOPTING 45 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS to DISMISS Without Prejudice for Failure to Prosecute; ORDER DIRECTING Case Closure by Court Clerk signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 5/12/2010. CASE CLOSED. (Bradley, A) |
Filing 48 ORDER ADOPTING S 46 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/10/2010. (Sondheim, M) |
Filing 46 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 2/4/2010 recommending that 43 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Jess Rico Martinez be DENIED. Objections to F&R due by 3/1/2010. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 44 ORDER REQUIRING Plaintiff to Furnish Further Information for Initiation of Service of Process and ORDER DENYING 40 Motion for Entry of Default signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 8/12/2009. Information Re: Defendant Nation due by 9/15/2009. (Sant Agata, S) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Martinez v. Whitman et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.