Kettle v. City of Modesto et al
1:2006cv01156 |
August 11, 2006 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Dennis L. Beck |
Anthony W. Ishii |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that this action be Dismissed based on Plaintiff's failure to obey the Court's Order of February 9, 2009. Motion referred to Judge Ishii, Objections to F&R due by 5/11/2009, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 4/3/09. (Gil-Garcia, A) |
Filing 29 ORDER Vacating January 16, 2008 19 Findings and Recommendations signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 2/13/2009. (Esteves, C) |
Filing 27 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 2/9/2009 recommending that Defendants, City of Modesto and Modesto Police Department be DISMISSED from action. Referred to Judge Anthony W. Ishii, Objections to F&R due by 3/16/2009. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 26 ORDER Directing Clerk of Court to Redesignate Action as a Regular Civil Case, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 02/04/2009. (Changes made by Clerk)(Martin, S) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Kettle v. City of Modesto et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.