Reed v. Hense
| 1:2006cv01757 |
| December 6, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Oliver W. Wanger |
| William M. Wunderlich |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
ORDER GRANTING 68 Motion to Proceed IFP on Appeal and DIRECTING Clerk to serve the Court of Appeals, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 04/19/2011. (Court of Appeals served electronicly) (Martin, S)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER Correcting Error in Filing of Petitioner's Motion to File Oversize Brief 63 ; ORDER Directing Clerk of Court to Serve Order and Copy of Petitioner's 63 Application For Certificate of Appealability to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 3/31/2011. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
58
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be DENIED WITH PREJUDICE and the Clerk of Court be DIRECTED to enter judgment for Respondent re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Jan Reed; referred to Judge Wanger, signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Dixon, Jr on 10/13/2010. Objections to F&R due by 11/15/2010(Martin, S)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER Permitting Petition to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and GRANTING Petitioner's 52 Motion for Transcript Fees to be Paid by the U.S. Marshall, signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Dixon, Jr on 10/2/2009. (Sondheim, M)
|
|
Filing
49
Notice and ORDER that Petitioner is No Longer Needed as Witness in These Proceedings, and the Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum 48 is Discharged signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Dixon, Jr on 9/10/2009. (Figueroa, O)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER authorizing issuance of subpoenas and payment of witnesses signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Dixon, Jr on 9/2/2009. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER Directing Parties to Submit Witness and Exhibit List; ORDER Setting Deadline for Motions in Limine signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Dixon, Jr on 08/27/2009. Witness List and Exhibit List due by 9/4/2009; Motions in Limine due by 9/8/2009. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER & WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM to Transport Petitioner Jan Reed for trial on September 10 and 11, 2009 at 7:45 a.m. signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Dixon, Jr on 8/19/2009. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER Authorizing Issuance of Subpoenas and Payment of Witnesses, signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Dixon, Jr on 04/16/2009. (Martin, S) (Subpoenas issued and mailed to Plaintiff's Attorney per her request)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER GRANTING 35 Request for additional witness, JUDY REED at the evidentiary hearing filed by Lydia Hense; no opposition to this request, signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Dixon, Jr on 04/14/2009. (Martin, S)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER SCHEDULING Evidentiary Hearing, APPOINTING Federal Defender, and DIRECTING Parties to Prepare Joint Statement, Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Dixon, Jr on 2/6/2009. Evidentiary Hearing set for 4/30/2009 at 08:45 AM in Ctrm. 8 before Magistrate Judge John M. Dixon Jr. Parties' Joint Statement due by 4/13/2009. (Arellano, S.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Reed v. Hense | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
