Sanchez v. Stancliff, et al.
Plaintiff: Anthony Joseph Sanchez
Defendant: Kern County Sheriff's Office, Stancliff, County of Kern and Carl Sparks
Case Number: 1:2007cv00128
Filed: January 23, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Lawrence J. O'Neill
Presiding Judge: Sandra M. Snyder
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 21, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 96 ORDER STRIKING Plaintiff's Untimely 95 Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 9/21/2009. (Jessen, A)
August 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 91 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that 74 Defendants' Amended Unenumerated 12(b) Motion to Dismiss be DENIED Without Prejudice; that Defendants' are Entitled to Judgment as a Matter of Law Such That Their 84 Motion for Summary J udgment be GRANTED; and that the Clerk of the Court be DIRECTED to Enter Judgment for the Defendants and Against Plaintiff re 22 Amended Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 8/14/2009. Referred to Judge O'Neill. Objections to F&R due by 9/3/2009. (Jessen, A)
August 10, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 90 ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 65 Motion to Compel ; DENYING 72 Motion to Stay; DENYING 75 Motion to Compel Discovery; DENYING 76 Motion for Extension of Discovery Cut-Off Date; DENYING 78 Motion for Subpoenas for Documents, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 8/10/2009. (Jessen, A)
January 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER STRIKING 60 Notice; ORDER GRANTING 61 MOTION for Thirty-Day EXTENSION of Time to File Response to 55 Order to Show Cause, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 1/23/2009. Show Cause Response due by 2/26/2009. (Sondheim, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sanchez v. Stancliff, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kern County Sheriff's Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stancliff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: County of Kern
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carl Sparks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anthony Joseph Sanchez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?