Zepeda v. Tate et al
| Jaime L. Zepeda |
| Harold Tate, L. Bluford, M. O' Brien and The Secretary of CDC&R |
| 1:2007cv00982 |
| July 10, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kern |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| William M. Wunderlich |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
ORDER, signed by Senior Judge Stephen M. McNamee on 7/12/2011.IT IS HEREBY ORDERED DENYING Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration forRelief from Judgment (Doc. 40 ).IT IS FURTHER ORDERED DENYING as moot Plaintiffs Application for Extension of Time to File Exhibits and Declarations in Support (Doc. 41 ).IT IS FURTHER ORDERED DENYING Plaintiffs Request for Judicial Notice(Doc. 43 ). (Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER DISMISSING Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim with Prejudice signed by Senior Judge Stephen M. McNamee on 05/18/2011. CASE CLOSED. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER Granting Plaintiff's Motion for an Extenstion of Time to File Third Amended Complaint 35 , signed by Senior Judge Stephen M. McNamee on 3/18/11. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint by Friday, May 6, 2011, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal counts as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). (Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER GRANTING 27 Motion to Amend the Complaint; ORDERED DISMISSING Plaintiff's SECOND Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim; ORDERED that if Plaintiff fails to file an Amended Complaint within 30 days, the dismissal will count as a STRIKE; ORDERED Clerk of Court to send copy of the form for filing a civil rights complaint (attached), signed by Senior Judge Stephen M. McNamee on 03/03/2011. Amended Complaint due by 4/7/2011 (Martin, S)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER That Defendant File a Response to Plaintiffs 27 Motion for Leave to Amended Complaint, signed by Senior Judge Stephen M. McNamee on 1/5/2011. (Response Deadline: 1/19/2011; Any Reply shall be filed by by 2/2/2011) (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER DENYING 25 Motion for "Relief from Order Due to Miskake and/or Inadvertence" signed by Senior Judge Stephen M. McNamee on 12/9/2010. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER Denying Motions (Doc. 16 and 22 ), signed by Senior Judge Stephen M. McNamee on 12/2/2010. (Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER that Plaintiff's 18 Second Amended Complaint is STRICKEN as Improperly Filed; ORDER that Plaintiff must File a RESPONSE to Defendants' 16 Motion to Dismiss no later than November 26, 2010; ORDER that Defendant may File a REPLY no later than December 6, 2010 signed by Senior Judge Stephen M. McNamee on 11/9/2010. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Stephen M. McNamee on 10/14/2010. Plaintiff's Response to Motion to Dismiss 16 is due by 11/12/2010. (Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Stephen M. McNamee on 06/28/2010 directing USM to serve Amended Complaint filed 08/31/2009 on Defendant, M. O'Brien. Service Deadline set for 10/29/2010. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Stephen M. McNamee on 1/7/2009; The Court advises the parties that the Court is conducting statutory screening.The matter will proceed following the issuance of the statutory screening order.(Figueroa, O)
|
|
Filing
6
FIRST INFORMATIONAL ORDER signed by Judge William M. Wunderlich on 07/13/2007. (Esteves, C)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
