Harnden v. California et al
| Jeff S. Harnden |
| California, Trujullio, M Alaniz, D. J. Ruiz, Warner, Birch, Brooks, Sheppard Brooks, Ayers, C. Camaties, MTA Garnett, IGF Campbell, Severns, K. Camaities and Ruiz |
| 1:2007cv01319 |
| September 10, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kings |
| Anthony W. Ishii |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
ORDER, signed by District Judge Mary H. Murguia on 2/13/2009. It is ORDERED: Plaintiff's status to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. # 8 ) is revoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The Order directing payment of an inmate filing fee is vacated. (Doc. # 9 ) Plaintiff's motion to amend is denied as moot. (Doc. # 21 ) This action is terminated pursuant to Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. (Doc. # 23 ) CASE CLOSED. (Scrivner, E)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER signed by District Judge Mary H. Murguia on 1/28/2009 advising the parties that the Court is conducting statutory screening. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER to Submit Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis or Pay Filing Fee signed by Judge Dennis L. Beck on 09/14/2007. IFP Deadline due by 10/17/2007. (Attachments: # 1 IFP app instructions# 2 blank IFP application)(Esteves, C)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
