Delano Farms Company et al v. The California Table Grape Commission
| Delano Farms Company, Four Star Fruit, Inc. and Gerawan Farming Inc |
| The California Table Grape Commission |
| 1:2007cv01610 |
| November 5, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Fresno |
| Sandra M. Snyder |
| Oliver W. Wanger |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
271
STIPULATION and ORDER Regarding Unsealing of Documents signed by District Judge Sam E. Haddon on 12/4/2013. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
261
FINDINGS of FACT and CONCLUSIONS of LAW ORDERING judgment entered on behalf of defendants; CASE CLOSED. Order signed by District Judge Sam E. Haddon on 9/12/2013. (Rooney, M)
|
|
Filing
246
ORDER regarding exhibits to be admitted during trial. Order signed by District Judge Sam E. Haddon on 6/3/2013. (Rooney, M)
|
|
Filing
239
ORDER GRANTING defendant The Table Grape Commission's unopposed Motion for Reconsideration of Magistrate Judge Thurston's ruling denying the pro hac vice application of Cynthia Vreeland, document 238 . The Court ORDERS Attorneys Deborah Anne Yates, Leon B. Greenfield, and Thomas Saunders terminated, and ALLOWS for the resubmission of Attorney Cynthia Vreeland's application for pro hac vice admission. Order signed by District Judge Sam E. Haddon on 5/23/2013. (Rooney, M)
|
|
Filing
237
ORDER DENYING Application of Attorney Cynthia Vreeland to Appear Pro Hac Vice 226 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 5/20/2013. (Hall, S)
|
|
Filing
220
ORDER Following Status Conference, signed by District Judge Sam E. Haddon on 4/5/2013. (Bench Trial set for 6/10/2013 at 08:30 AM in Visiting Judge (TBD) before District Judge Sam E. Haddon.) (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
217
MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER Re Cross Motions for Summary Judgment 185 192 & 194 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/25/2013. (The parties cross motions for summary judgment as to the Ludys uses are DENIED; Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment as to Dr. Badrs use is DENIED; Defendants cross-motion is GRANTED.) (Gaumnitz, R)
|
|
Filing
201
ORDER Granting the California Table Grape Commission's Request to Seal Exhibits 1-4 of the Declaration of Ronald E. Tarailo, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/18/13. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
184
ORDER Regarding Deadline for Filing Dispositive Motions re 182 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 11/20/2012. (Hall, S)
|
|
Filing
181
ORDER Regarding Dismissal Of The First, Fourth, Fifth, And Sixth Claims For Relief In Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 11/13/2012. (Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
178
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - Amnesty Documents 177 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 8/8/2012. (Hall, S)
|
|
Filing
176
ORDER REQUIRING the California Table Grape Commission to Produce Unredacted Documents, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 8/1/2012. (Hall, S)
|
|
Filing
169
ORDER Granting 156 Motion for Leave To File A Third Amended Complaint, and ORDER Denying Request for Judicial Notice signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 5/23/2012. (Leon-Guerrero, A)
|
|
Filing
163
STIPULATION and ORDER 162 Regarding Use of Discovery from Prior Litigation, Signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on May 15, 2012. (Hall, S)
|
|
Filing
160
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 4/12/2012. Motion hearing re: 156 MOTION to AMEND and Mid-Discovery Status Conference are RESET to 5/22/2012 at 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Counsel is authorized to appear by telephone. (Leon-Guerrero, A)
|
|
Filing
155
PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 3/23/2012. (Rooney, M)
|
|
Filing
123
ORDER DISMISSING Plaintiffs' 87 Second Amended Complaint Without Leave to Amend and DENYING AS MOOT Plaintiffs' 96 Motion for Certification of Orders for Interlocutory Appeal signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 8/2/2010. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
121
MEMORANDUM DECISION granting motions to dismiss 99 101 and finding as moot Motion for Certificate of Appealability 93 96 , signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 7/26/10. (Coffman, Lisa)
|
|
Filing
120
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 97 Motion to Intervene, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 7/23/10. (Coffman, Lisa)
|
|
Filing
92
STIPULATION and ORDER Regarding a Sixty-Day Extension of Time for all Defendants to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 12/7/2009. Response to Second Amended Complaint due by 2/2/2010. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
86
Stipulation and ORDER Regarding the California Table Grape Commission's Response to Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 11/5/2009. ( Filing Deadline: 12/7/2009)(Figueroa, O)
|
|
Filing
84
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 66 68 Federal Defendants' and Commission's Motions to Dismiss. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within twenty (20) days. Signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 10/27/09. (Coffman, Lisa)
|
|
Filing
42
MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER [GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART] Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and [DENYING] Defendant's Motion to Strike 19 , signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 2/18/09. (Hellings, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
