Aubert v. Elijah et al
| Ess'nn A. Aubert |
| Kevin Elijah, Mario Garcia and A. Hedgpeth |
| 1:2007cv01629 |
| November 8, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kern |
| Gary S. Austin |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
122
Notice and ORDER that Inmate Witness Is No Longer Needed as Witness in these Proceedings, and the 117 Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum is Discharged, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 11/7/13. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
117
ORDER & WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM to Transport Ess'nn A. Aubert, CDC# V-77688 to Trial on November 6, 2013 at 7:30 a.m., Courtroom 4, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 10/31/13. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
112
ORDER & WRIT Of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum To Transport Ess'nn A. Aubert, CDC#V-77688, Date: November 5, 2013, Time: 7:30 a.m., signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 10/22/2013. (Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
100
ORDER and WRIT of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum to transport Plaintiff, Ess'nn A. Aubert for trial on October 29, 2013 at 7:30 a.m. signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 9/23/2013. (Lundstrom, T).
|
|
Filing
93
NOTICE to Parties Regarding Impacted Trial Calendar and Availability of Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 7/26/13. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER DENYING 84 Motion for Settlement Conference signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 5/6/2013. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER Requiring Parties To Notify Court Whether A Settlement Conference Would Be Beneficial, Thirty-Day Deadline, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 3/27/2013.(Responses due by 4/30/2013) (Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER Adopting FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (ECF No. 76 ), signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/26/2013. This action is referred to the Magistrate Judge for further pretrial proceedings as to Defendants Elijah and Garcia.(Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER Denying Motion For Appointment Of Counsel (Motion# 77 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 3/21/2013. (Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
76
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that 61 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment be DENIED re 1 Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 2/28/2013. Referred to Judge O'Neill. Objections to F&R due within twenty (20) days. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
72
AMENDED SECOND INFORMATIONAL ORDER - Notice And Warning Of Requirements For Opposing Defendants' Summary Judgment Motion (Doc. 61 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 8/23/2012. (Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER Directing Clerk to Re-Serve Second Informational Order with RAND Notice Upon Plaintiff, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 7/9/12. (Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER Requiring Plaintiff to File Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to Defendnat Garcia's Motion for Summary Judgment 61 , Within Thirty Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 4/11/12. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER Re: 53 Findings and Recommendations, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 9/14/11. Defendant Elijah's 42 Motion for Summary Judgment is denied. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER Granting in Part Defendants' Motion for Leave to Conduct Depositions by Videoconference 55 , signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 8/10/11. (Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER Denying Motion For Appointment Of Counsel (# 56 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 7/14/2011. (Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
53
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS re: Defendant Elijah's Motion for Summary Judgment 42 , signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 5/11/11. Referred to Judge O'Neill. Objections Due in Thirty Days. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER DENYING 31 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel; and ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Request for Appointment of Counsel, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 10/13/2010. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER Adopting 35 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ORDER DENYING Defendant Elijah's 23 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, or in the Alternative, Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Exhaust signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 9/28/2010. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
35
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending that Defendants 23 Motion to Dismiss be DENIED, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 8/24/2010, referred to Judge O'Neill. Objections to F&R due by 9/27/2010. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER GRANTING Defendants 33 Ex Parte Motion to Extend the Deadline Pretrial Dispositive Motions, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 7/28/2010. (Dispositive Motions filed by 10/29/2010) (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER denying 25 Request by U.S. Marshal for reimbursement of Costs signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 3/1/2010. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER Adopting 13 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ORDER for this Action to Proceed on Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment Claim Only, and Dismissing Plaintiff's Supervisory Liability claim signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 7/30/2009. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER to Submit New Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis AND Certified Copy of Trust Account Statement OR Pay Filing Fee within Thirty (30) Days, signed by Judge Gary S. Austin on 11/16/07. IFP Deadline due by 12/19/2007. (Attachments: # 1 IFP Application# 2 IFP Instructions)(Verduzco, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
