Cramer v. Dickinson et al
Latanya Cramer |
S. Dickinson, J. Dickinson and Patricia A. Johnson |
1:2008cv00375 |
March 17, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Madera |
Anthony W. Ishii |
William M. Wunderlich |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 78 ORDER ADOPTING 70 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ORDER Granting Defendants' 40 Motion to Dismiss; ORDER Dismissing Action, with Prejudice, for Failure to State a Claim, Based on the Doctrine of Res Judicata; ORDER that Dismissal is Subject to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), ORDER Directing Clerk to Close Case signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 03/20/2013. CASE CLOSED. (Flores, E) |
Filing 70 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, Recommending That Defendants' Motion To Dismiss Be Granted, With Prejudice, For Failure To State A Claim, Based On The Doctrine Of Res Judicata (Doc. 40 ), Objections, If Any, Due In 30 Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 1/9/2013. F&R's referred to Judge Anthony W. Ishii; Objections to F&R due by 2/11/2013.(Fahrney, E) |
Filing 63 ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 56 57 Motions to Reopen and for Extension of Time, and Order Denying as Moot Second 59 Motion to Reopen signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 11/16/2012. Opposition due by 12/26/2012. (Flores, E) |
Filing 53 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Dismiss 35 Case, with Prejudice, for Failure to Obey a Court Order and Failure to Prosecute signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 05/21/2012. Referred to Judge Ishii; Objections to F&R due by 6/25/2012. (Flores, E) |
Filing 52 ORDER Requiring Plaintiff to File Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to Defendants' 40 Motion to Dismiss within Thirty Days signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 04/05/2012. Opposition due by 5/8/2012. (Flores, E) |
Filing 51 ORDER STRIKING Motion for Lack of Signature 49 , signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 2/7/12. (Hellings, J) |
Filing 47 ORDER Striking Response for Lack of Signature signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 01/26/2012. (Flores, E) |
Filing 39 ORDER Denying 38 Request for Relief from Provisions of Local Rule 230(1), signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 11/1/11. (Verduzco, M) |
Filing 28 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 2/19/2011 recommending that 27 Amended Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint filed by Latanya Cramer be Dismissed with prejudice. Referred to Judge Anthony W. Ishii; Objections to F&R due by 3/28/2011. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 26 ORDER DISMISSING Plaintiff's 23 Second Amended Complaint For Failure to State a Claim; Third Amended Complaint Due Within Thirty Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 1/19/2011. Third Amended Complaint due by 2/25/2011. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 25 ORDER VACATING 20 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 5/6/2010. (Sondheim, M) |
Filing 22 ORDER GRANTING Extension of Time to File Amended Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 3/8/2010. Amended Complaint due by 4/12/2010. (Sondheim, M) |
Filing 20 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that this Action be DISMISSED for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can be Granted re 18 First Amended Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 2/9/2010. Referred to Judge Ishii. Objections to F&R due by 3/5/2010. (Jessen, A) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.