Burch v. Hartley, et al.
Plaintiff: Christopher H. Burch
Defendant: James A. Hartley, Ellen A. Greenman and Castillo
Case Number: 1:2008cv00508
Filed: April 14, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Prisoner: Civil Rights Office
County: Kings
Presiding Judge: Gary S. Austin
Presiding Judge: Oliver W. Wanger
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 21, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER DISMISSING Action, without Prejudice signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 12/18/2009. CASE CLOSED (Figueroa, O)
December 15, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER Addressing Notice of Voluntary Dismissal 52 ; ORDER Directing Defendant to File Opposition, if any, within Twenty One Days signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 12/14/2009. ( Opposition Deadline: 1/18/2010) (Figueroa, O)
September 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT Daniel Young Shin, With Prejudice, Pursuant to 48 Stipulation of Dismissal; ORDER DENYING AS MOOT 25 Defendant Daniel Young Shin's Motion to Dismiss, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 9/28/2009. (Jessen, A)
September 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER VACATING HEARING Set for October 30, 2009, at 9:30 A.M. on 25 Defendant Daniel Young Shin's Motion to Dismiss, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 9/17/2009. Plaintiff's Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition due by 10/16/2009. Defendant's Reply, If Any, Due by 10/27/2009. (Jessen, A)
August 31, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 8/28/2009. Show Cause Response due by 10/5/2009.(Lundstrom, T)
August 28, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER Directing Clerk of the Court to Terminate Karen Travis as Attorney of Record for Plaintiff, Add Galorah keshavarz with Khorrami Pollard & Abir LLP as Attorney of Record for Plaintiff, and Serve a Copy of this Order on Ms. Keshavarz and Ms. Travis; ORDER Directing Defendant Shin to Re-Serve Filings on Galorah Keshavarz signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 08/27/2009. Attorney Galorah Keshavarz-NOT CAED ADMITTED for Christopher H. Burch added. (Flores, E)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Burch v. Hartley, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher H. Burch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James A. Hartley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ellen A. Greenman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Castillo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?