Randle v. Franklin, et al.
Willie D. Randle |
L V Franklin, Philips, Nicolas, K Williams, J Juarez and J Castro Philips |
1:2008cv00845 |
June 18, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
Kern |
William M. Wunderlich |
None |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 138 ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 137 Motion for Renewed Request of Transfer of Full Record on Appeal signed by District Judge James A Teilborg on 01/23/2012. Transcript Desigantion Form due 2/10/2012. (Flores, E) |
Filing 133 ORDER signed by District Judge James A Teilborg on 7/25/2011 denying as moot 131 Motion for request for transfer of full record on appeal. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 128 ORDER, signed by District Judge James A Teilborg on 5/25/11: Plaintiff's Motion for New Trial 120 is DENIED . (Hellings, J) |
Filing 115 Notice and ORDER that Willie D. Randle #D-89098, is No Longer Needed in These Proceedings, signed by District Judge James A Teilborg on 3/23/11. (Verduzco, M) |
Filing 114 Notice and ORDER that David Hill #F-70901, is No Longer Needed in these Proceedings, signed by District Judge James A Teilborg on 3/22/11. (Verduzco, M) |
Filing 105 ORDER Quashing 92 Order & Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum to Transport David Hill CDC#AB-9867, signed by District Judge James A Teilborg on 3/16/11. (Verduzco, M) |
Filing 102 ORDER denying 101 Motion to continue Trial Date signed by District Judge James A Teilborg on 3/15/2011. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 98 ORDER, signed by District Judge James A Teilborg on 3/1/11: The Clerk of the Court shall return the four money orders to the person(s) who delivered the money orders to the Court on behalf of Plaintiff, together with a copy of this Order; That subpoenas described in Docket 87 and 88 will not be served by the United States Marshal, and are effectively quashed. (Hellings, J) |
Filing 97 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 96 Motion to Compel signed by District Judge James A Teilborg on 2/28/2011. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 92 ORDER & WRIT of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum to Transport Witness David Hill #AB-9867, signed by District Judge James A Teilborg on 2/24/11. (Verduzco, M) |
Filing 89 ORDER signed by District Judge James A Teilborg on 2/9/2011 requiring Plaintiff to submit witness fees to the Court. (Case Management Deadline: 2/25/2011).(Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 88 ORDER Directing Service of Subpoena by United States Marshals Service without Prepayment of Costs; Subpoena to be served on Lieutenant J. Smith, signed by District Judge James A Teilborg on 02/01/2011. (Martin, S) |
Filing 87 ORDER signed by District Judge James A Teilborg on 1/27/2011 directing service of 15 Civil Subpoenas by U.S. Marshals Service without prepayment of costs. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 72 ORDER GRANTING Defendants' 71 Amended First Request for Extension of Time to Respond Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions; ORDER DENYING AS MOOT Defendants' First 70 Request for Extension of Time to Respond Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions signed by District Judge James A Teilborg on 11/2/2010. Defendants' Responses due by 11/5/2010. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 66 ORDER DENYING 63 Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel and ORDER Extending Deadlines, signed by District Judge James A Teilborg on 7/23/2010. Plaintiff's Motions in Limine due by 10/12/2010. Final Pretrial Conference CONTINUED to 12/13/2010 at 10:00 AM (11:00 AM Arizona time) before District Judge James A Teilborg. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 62 ORDER Setting Final Pretrial Conference, signed by District Judge James A Teilborg on 08/31/2010. (Final Pretrial Conference set for November 8, 2010 at 10:15 a.m. to be held at 401 W. Washington Street, Phoenix, Arizona, Courtroom 503 - Telephonically)(Martin, S) |
Filing 59 ORDER re: Plaintiff's 53 Motion to Compel signed by District Judge James A Teilborg on 8/3/2010. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs 53 motion to compel is GRANTED to the extent that Defendants shall produce Kern Valley State Prison Facility, Building B, 4th floor control log book entries for October 29, 2007, as redacted in accordance with this Order, to Plaintiff within 14 days of the date of this Order. (Bradley, A) |
Filing 43 ORDER, signed by District Judge James A Teilborg on 3/31/10: Defendants Franklin and Phillips request to complete Plaintiff's deposition via videoconference 39 is GRANTED. (Hellings, J) |
Filing 36 ORDER to Send Plaintiff a New Summons and USM-285 Form for Defendant J. Nichols, signed by District Judge James A Teilborg on 3/8/2010. (Sondheim, M) |
Filing 34 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE and SCHEDULING ORDER signed by District Judge James A Teilborg on 2/25/2010. (Discovery due by 8/2/2010. Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 5/3/2010. Non-Dispositive Motions filed by 4/1/2010. Dispositive Motions filed by 8/23/2010). (Show Cause Response due by 3/29/2010.)(Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 30 ORDER to File a Current Address for Defendant Sather and Defendant Nicholas signed by District Judge James A Teilborg on 2/2/2010. If an address for either or both Defendants is provided under seal, the Clerk of the Court shall forward a copy of this Order to the Marshals, with the sealed address(es), and the Marshals shall complete service consistent with this Courts order of October 26, 2009.(Filing of Address Deadline: 2/23/2010) (Figueroa, O) |
Filing 22 ORDER, signed by District Judge James A Teilborg on 10/1/09: Plaintiff's motion to amend the complaint 19 is GRANTED; the Clerk of the Court shall file the amended complaint lodged at Doc. #20; FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall update the docket to reflect that the Defendants are Correctional Officer L.V. Franklin, Correctional Officer J. Nicholas, Correctional Control Officer L. Phillips, and Correctional Sergeant B. Sather; FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion fo r three additional service packets for J. Nicholas, B. Sather and L. Phillips 18 is GRANTED; Service is appropriate for J. Nicholas, B. Sather and L. Phillips; Clerk to send plaintiff: (3) Summons, (3) USM-285 Forms, and (3) copies of the Amended Complaint filed on 10/5/09; FURTHER ORDERED extending Defendant Franklin's time to respond to the amended complaint until October 19, 2009. (Case Management Deadline: 11/9/2009) (Encls. to Plaintiff as directed in this Order) (Hellings, J) |
Filing 14 ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT SERVICE DOCUMENTS and USM-285 Forms. Service is appropriate for J Castro Philips. Clerk to send plaintiff: 1 Summons, 1 USM-285 Forms, and 1 copies of the Complaint filed on 6/18/2008; ORDER GRANTING Defendant Fr anklin's 13 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer; ORDER for Clerk of the Court to forward a copy of this Order to the Marshals signed by District Judge James A Teilborg on 8/26/2009. Case Management Deadline: 9/28/2009; Defendant Franklin's Response to Complaint due by 10/5/2009, Marshal's status report due by 9/8/2009. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 8 ORDER Finding Service of Complaint Appropriate, and Forwarding Service Documents to Plaintiff for Completion and Return Within Thirty Days; Defendants J Juarez, K Williams and Chavez are Dismissed without Prejudice signed by District Judge James A Te ilborg on 4/16/2009. If Plaintiff fails to return the Notice of Submission of Documents and the required documents within 30 days of the date of filing of this Order, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice. Completed Service Documents due by 5/20/2009.(Flores, E) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.