Wilmshurst v. The City of Angels Camp et al
| Richard E. Wilmshurst |
| The City of Angels Camp, Chris Comfort and Tony Tacheira |
| 1:2008cv00858 |
| June 18, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Calaveras |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Sandra M. Snyder |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
98
AMENDED 97 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE re Civil Contempt signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 10/4/2011. Plaintiff Richard E. Wilmshurst shall appear for Hearing now SET for 10/20/2011 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (WBS) before Judge Shubb to SHOW CAUSE why he should not be held in contempt for failure to comply with Court's 89 Order. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
97
ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 9/27/11 ADOPTING 95 Findings and Recommendations in Full. It is THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff, Richard E. Wilmshurst APPEAR on 10/20/2011 at 08:15 AM in Courtroom 4 (WBS) of the Robert E. Coyle U.S. Cour thouse, 2500 Tulare Street, Fresno, CA before Judge William B. Shubb and SHOW CAUSE why he should not be held in civil contempt for failure to comply with the 89 Order. Plaintiff is advised that failure to appear may result in his being adjudged in contempt. (Donati, J)
|
|
Filing
95
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that proceedings for contempt of the Court's order be initiated against Plaintiff re 3 Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 7/9/2011. Referred to Judge Shubb. Objections to F&R due within fifteen (15) days. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER for Deposition and Production of Documents in Aid of Execution of Judgment re 68 , signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 5/23/2011. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER for Deposition and Production of Documents in Aid of Execution of Judgment: Plaintiff Richard Wilmshurst is Ordered to appear for deposition on 1/14/2011 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 7 (SMS) before Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder. signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 11/19/2010. (Herman, H)
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER GRANTING 76 Application for Nonappearance; ORDER DEEMING Application as a Renewed Request for Substitution of Attorney for Plaintiff In Propria Persona; and ORDER GRANTING Renewed Request for Substitution of Attorney for Plaintiff In Propria Persona, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 11/10/2010. Attorney Kenneth M. Foley terminated. Richard E. Wilmshurst added as pro se. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 08/26/10 DENYING 66 Substitution of Attorney. (Williams, D)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER on Plaintiff's Request for Telephonic Appearance for Pretrial Conference, signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 11/23/2009. Pretrial Conference set for 11/24/2009 at 10:00 AM before Judge William B. Shubb. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER ADVANCING TRIAL DATE: Jury Trial currently set for 12/14/09 has been ADVANCED to 12/9/2009 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4(LJO) before District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on November 10, 2009. (Lira, I)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER TO RESET PRETRIAL CONFERENCE signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on October 28, 2009. Pretrial Conference currently set for 11/3/09 has been CONTINUED to 11/24/2009 at 08:15 AM in Courtroom 4(LJO) before District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill.(Lira, I)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
