Garduno v. Board of Parole Hearing
Petitioner: Armando Garduno
Respondent: Board of Parole Hearing
Case Number: 1:2008cv00973
Filed: July 11, 2008
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Kings
Presiding Judge: Theresa A. Goldner
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 27, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 28 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that Respondent's 22 Motion to Dismiss be Granted and the 5 Petition be Dismissed; ORDER REQUIRING Objections to be Filed Within Twenty Days signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 8/26/2009. Referred to Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. Objections to F&R due by 9/21/2009. (Sant Agata, S)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Garduno v. Board of Parole Hearing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Armando Garduno
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Board of Parole Hearing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?