Sofowora v. Chertoff et al
| Edward Sofowora |
| Michael Chertoff, Michael Mukasey, Robin F. Baker, Nancy Alcantar and Donny Youngblood |
| 1:2008cv01177 |
| August 12, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
| Kern |
| William M. Wunderlich |
| None |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
ORDER DENYING Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; ORDER DIRECTING Clerk of Court to Enter Judgment; CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY NOT REQUIRED; ORDER DENYING Petitioner's Emergency Motions as Moot 29 , 31 , 33 , 34 , signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Dixon, Jr on 9/30/10. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER REQUIRING Respondent to Apprise the Court of Petitioner's Current Deportation Status; ORDER REQUIRING Parties to Brief Court in light of Ninth Circuit Ruling signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Dixon, Jr on 1/8/2010. Respondent's brief due by 2/10/2010. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER GRANTING Petitioner's 21 MOTION for EXTENSION of TIME to File Objections, signed by Magistrate Judge William M. Wunderlich on 1/15/2009. Objections due by 2/19/2009. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER GRANTING Petitioner's First 19 Motion for Extension of Time to File Objections, signed by Magistrate Judge William M. Wunderlich on 1/5/2009. Objections to F&R due by 2/9/2009. (Sondheim, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
