Powell v. Smith et al
| Tony Edward Powell |
| D. Smith and McFadden |
| 1:2008cv01443 |
| September 25, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Merced |
| Dennis L. Beck |
| None |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 28:1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
ORDER, signed by Senior Judge Stephen M. McNamee on 3/6/2013. Plaintiff's motion re: exhibit and motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied as moot (Doc. 60 ). Plaintiff's motion for independent action to obtain relief from judgment is denied as moot (Doc. 62 ). Defendants' motion to revoke Plaintiff's In Forma Pauperis status (Doc. 65 ). It is Further ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall forward a copy of this Order to the Clerk of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. (Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER GRANTING 43 , 49 Petitioner's Motion to Reopen Time to File an Appeal and ORDER DENYING AS MOOT Plaintiff's Motions (Docs. 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 ) signed by Senior Judge Stephen M. McNamee on 10/29/2012. Plaintiff shall have 14 days from the entry of this order in which to file a Notice of Appeal. cc: Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals via CM/ECF. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER Denying 49 Plaintiff's Motion to Supplement, signed by Senior Judge Stephen M. McNamee on 12/2/11. (Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER, signed by Senior Judge Stephen M. McNamee on 9/26/2011.IT IS HEREBY ORDERED GRANTING Plaintiffs Motion to Pursue an Untimely Appeal (Doc. 40 ) to the extent it requests a copy of the Courts February 8, 2010 Order. TheClerk is directed to mail Plaintiff a copy of the Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Reopen the Case (Doc 41 ) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 44 ) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for a Thirty-day Extension ofTime (Doc. 43 ) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Correct a Misnomer (Doc. 45 ) is DENIED. (Enclosed: Copy of the Courts February 8, 2010 Order.) (Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER GRANTING Defendants' Smith and McFadden 25 Motion to Dismiss; ORDER DISMISSING Plaintiff's 18 Third Amended Complaint, Without Prejudice signed by Senior Judge Stephen M. McNamee on 2/8/2010. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Stephen M. McNamee on 1/4/10: Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration 34 regarding the Court's denial of appointment of counsel is DENIED. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 28 Motion for Subpoenas ; DENYING AS MOOT 32 Motion for Abeyance, signed by Senior Judge Stephen M. McNamee on 12/17/2009. (Martin, S)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER DENYING 27 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Senior Judge Stephen M. McNamee on 12/2/2009. (Figueroa, O)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Stephen M. McNamee on 11/3/2009. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff must file a response to Defendant's 25 MOTION to DISMISS, together with copies of grievances, sworn declarations or other admissible evidence by 12/4/2 009. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's may file a reply within 15 days after service of Plaintiff's response. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss will be deemed ready for decision without oral argument on the day following the date set for filing a reply unless otherwise ordered by the Court. (Bradley, A)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER re 18 Amended Complaint Filed by Tony Edward Powell, Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M. McNamee on 4/2/2009. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint Unsigned. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Within 30 Days, Plaintiff Must File the Enclosed Certificate. (Arellano, S.)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Stephen M. McNamee on 1/7/2009, The Court advises the parties that the Court is conducting statutory screening. The matter will proceed following the issuance of the statutory screening order. (Figueroa, O)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
