U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Timeless Investments, Inc. et al
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission |
Timeless Investments, Inc. and Does 1 - 5 |
1:2008cv01469 |
September 29, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
Fresno |
Anthony W. Ishii |
Sandra M. Snyder |
Plaintiff |
U.S. Government Plaintiff |
29:623 Job Discrimination (Age) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 67 CONSENT DECREE ORDER signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 2/16/2011. CASE CLOSED.(Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 65 STIPULATION and ORDER to Continue the Due Date of the Consent Decree, Signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 12/17/2010. The parties must submit the Consent Decree on or before February 1, 2011. (Arellano, S.) |
Filing 63 STIPULATION to Continue the Due Date of the Consent Decree; and ORDER: filing of the Consent Decree extension from 10/22/2010 to 12/13/2010 - Granted. signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 10/20/2010. (Herman, H) |
Filing 61 STIPULATION and ORDER GRANTING the parties' request for an extension of time to submit the consent decree; case management deadline set for 10/22/2010 for receipt of same; order signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 9/24/2010. (Rooney, M) |
Filing 53 ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's 32 Motion for Summary Judgment as to First, Second, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, and Ninth Affirmative Defenses; DENYING Plaintiff's Third Affirmative Defense; DENYING Defendant's 31 Motion for Summary Judgment on the issue of conciliation, regarding Rule 25(a), regarding Carlbergs damages, regarding Plaintiffs ADEA claim, regarding laches and Carlberg; GRANTING Defendants motion for summary judgment regarding laches and Rex, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 8/13/2010. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 51 ORDER vacating hearing date of 7/26/10 and taking matter under submission. signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 7/22/10. (Nazaroff, H) |
Filing 43 ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL BRIEFING TO BE FILED BY 4:00 P.M. JULY 13, 2010, (Deadline set for 4:00PM on 7/13/2010 for parties to file a brief on the issue of whether the Court should stay the proceedings for further conciliation efforts if the Court later finds that the EEOC did not conciliate in good faith). All other dates and deadlines remain unchanged, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 7/3/10. (Robles, S) |
Filing 42 ORDER resetting hearing on June 28, 2010 to July 26, 2010 at 1:30 p.m. before Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii. signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 6/24/2010. (Nazaroff, H) |
Filing 30 STIPULATION Regarding Discovery Disputes; ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 4/5/2010. (Herman, H) |
Filing 25 STIPULATION to Continue the Discovery Cut-Off and Subsequent Pretrial and Trial Dates; and ORDER - Non-expert Discovery by 2/26/2010. Expert Disclosure by 3/5/2010. Supplemental Expert Disclosure by 3/19/2010. Expert Discovery Cut-Off by 4/9/2010. Dispositive Motions by 4/23/2010. Non-Dispositive Motions by 4/23/2010. JURY TRIAL set for 10/5/2010 (was 3/23/2010) at 08:30 AM and PRETRIAL CONFERENCE set for 7/27/2010 (was 2/2/2010) at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 2 (AWI) before Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii. signed by Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 10/7/2009. (Herman, H) |
Filing 15 ORDER Denying Defendant's Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss re 5 , ( Answer due by 1/27/2009.) signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 1/13/09. (Gil-Garcia, A) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.