Daniels v. Felker et al
| Gene M Daniels |
| T. Felker and Attorney General for the State of California |
| 1:2008cv01590 |
| February 5, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Anthony W. Ishii |
| William M. Wunderlich |
| Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATION Regarding Respondent's Motion to Dismiss 31 , signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 5/8/11. Referred to Judge Ishii. Thirty Day Deadline. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER REQUIRING Respondent to File Response; Thirty-Day Deadline signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 9/17/2010. Response to Petition due by 10/18/2010. (Bradley, A)
|
|
Filing
28
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending that Respondent's 26 MOTION to DISMISS for failure to exhaust state remedies be DENIED, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 7/20/2010, referred to Judge Ishii. Objections to F&R due by 8/24/2010(Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER for Respondent to Re-Submit Motion to Dismiss; ORDER to TERMINATE 18 MOTION TO DISMISS, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 2/4/2010. Response to Petition due by 2/22/2010. Petitioner's Response to Motion to Dismiss Filing Deadline: 3/10/2010. (Sondheim, M)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER DENYING 3 , 8 Motions to Appoint Counsel, signed by Magistrate Judge William M. Wunderlich on 2/2/2009. (Sondheim, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
