Packs v. Adams et al
Charles Austin Packs |
Daryl G. Adams, F.E. Braswell, W. Young, T. Hieng, K. Alexander, F. Pighting, C. Garnett and Primary Care Provider |
1:2008cv01628 |
October 27, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
Sacramento |
William M. Wunderlich |
None |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 88 NOTICE and ORDER that Plaintiff Charles Austin Parks, CDC#K-72151, is no Longer Needed as Witness in these Proceedings, and the 66 Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum is DISCHARGED signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 7/20/2011. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 86 ORDER REQUIRING Production of Plaintiff for Trial on July 20, 2011, at 8:00 a.m. signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 7/19/2011. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 78 ORDER CONTINUING Video Appearance of Inmate Dixon to July 19, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 7/18/2011. Counsel for Defendants Required to Arrange for Video Testimony of Inmate Dixon at 9:00 a.m. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 74 ORDER VACATING 69 July 6, 2011, Order and Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum as to Inmate Mark Dixon, CDC# V-96657, and ORDERING Inmate Dixon to Appear by Conference on July 18, 2011, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 7/9/2011. cc: CDCR Transportation, Out-to-Court and Litigation Offices at Pelican Bay State Prison. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 73 ORDER Following Telephonic Hearing and GRANTING Defendants' Request for Video Appearance by Inmate Dixon at Trial, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 7/7/2011. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 58 ORDER Confirming Trial for July 18, 2011; ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff's Motion for the Attendance of Incarcerated Witnesses 50 , 51 ; ORDER Requiring Plaintiff to Submit Witness Fees by June 30, 2011, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/14/11. Jury Trial set for 7/18/2011 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. (Verduzco, M) |
Filing 45 ORDER Requiring Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE Why Defendant John Doe Should Not be Dismissed from Action, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 4/8/11. 30-Day Deadline. (Verduzco, M) |
Filing 42 ORDER ADOPTING 41 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL; ORDER GRANTING 38 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment With Respect to Plaintiff's Claims Against Defendant Hieng; and ORDER DENYING 38 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment In All Other Respects, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/7/2011. Defendant T. Hieng terminated. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 41 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that Defendants' 38 Motion for Summary Judgment be Partially Granted signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 01/13/2011. Referred to Judge O'Neill; Objections to F&R due by 2/17/2011. (Flores, E) |
Filing 39 ORDER DENYING 35 Motion to Compel; ORDERED Defendant Braswell and Defendant Hieng shall mail Plaintiff a copy of their responses to Plaintiff's interrogatories within twenty (20) days of the date of service of this order, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 10/19/2010. (Martin, S) |
Filing 33 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 3/1/2010 denying 29 Affidavit / Motion to Compel filed by Charles Austin Parks. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 10 ORDER Granting 4 Motion signed by Magistrate Judge William M. Wunderlich on 5/1/2009. The official record is corrected with the correct spelling of Plaintiff's name. (Esteves, C) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.