Bridgeforth v. White
Plaintiff: Charles R Bridgeforth
Defendant: K. M. White
Case Number: 1:2009cv00135
Filed: January 22, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Prisoner: Civil Rights Office
County: Merced
Presiding Judge: William M. Wunderlich
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1331 Fed. Question

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 9, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER DISMISSING Action, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 10/8/09: Action is DISMISSED for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)
January 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 1/7/09. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/16/2009) [Transferred from cand on 1/22/2009.]
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bridgeforth v. White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charles R Bridgeforth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: K. M. White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?