Chambers v. Shaver
Plaintiff: Edwin James Chambers
Defendant: Donald Shaver
Case Number: 1:2009cv00225
Filed: February 4, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
County: Stanislaus
Presiding Judge: Anthony W. Ishii
Presiding Judge: Gary S. Austin
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 6 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 2/17/2009. Motion referred to Judge Anthony W. Ishii, Objections to F&R due by 3/20/2009. (Esteves, C)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chambers v. Shaver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edwin James Chambers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Donald Shaver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?