Falcon v. Hense et al
1:2009cv00660 |
April 14, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
William M. Wunderlich |
William M. Wunderlich |
None |
Federal Question |
28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 31 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Regarding Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 04/24/2012. Referred to Judge Ishii; Objections to F&R due by 5/14/2012. (Flores, E) |
Filing 26 ORDER DENYING Motion for Appointment of Counsel 25 , signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 8/31/10. (Hellings, J) |
Filing 15 ORDER Adopting 12 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION; ORDER DISMISSING Ground One From 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; ORDER DECLINING TO ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY; ORDER REFERRING Matter Back to Magistrate Judge for Further Proceedings signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 5/28/2010. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 13 ORDER DENYING Petitioner's 8 Motion to Expedite, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 4/16/2010. (Sondheim, M) |
Filing 10 ORDER DENYING 9 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 2/4/2010. (Figueroa, O) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Falcon v. Hense et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.