Washington v. Adams et al
| Toromi Washington |
| Derrell G. Adams, Quinonez and Rosenquist |
| 1:2009cv00827 |
| May 11, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kings |
| William M. Wunderlich |
| William M. Wunderlich |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending that Plaintiff's 19 Third Amended Complaint be Dismissed with Prejudice for Failure to State a Claim upon which Relief may be Granted, with the Clerk to Close the Case and the Dismissal Subject to "Three Strikes" Provision signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 1/12/2012. Referred to Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. Objections to F&R due by 2/16/2012. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
21
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending That Plaintiff's Motion for Injunctive Relief Be Denied; Objections Due in Thirty (30) Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 2/14/11: 19 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint filed by Toromi Washington, 20 MOTION for INJUNCTIVE RELIEF filed by Toromi Washington REFERRED to Judge Wanger. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER Denying Motion for Default 15 ; ORDER Denying Motion for Summary Judgment 16 , signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 8/10/2010. (Verduzco, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
