Gil v. Yates et al
Francisco J. Gil |
James A. Yates, J. Woodend, M. C. Davis, H. Martinez, R. Shannon, C. Hudson, R. Galaviz and N. Grannis |
1:2009cv00917 |
May 26, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Fresno |
Sandra M. Snyder |
None |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 110 ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Request for Transmittal of Transcripts to Ninth Circuit; ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's Request for Excerpts of Record 109 , signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 2/28/14: The Clerk's Office shall serve a courtesy copy of this order on the Ninth Circuit. (Hellings, J) |
Filing 100 ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Motion Regarding Discovery 95 , signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 8/26/13. (Hellings, J) |
Filing 92 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Regarding Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 77 , signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 7/22/13. Referred to Judge O'Neill; 30-Day Deadline. (Verduzco, M) |
Filing 91 ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 86 Motion to File Amended Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 6/22/2013. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 80 ORDER Denying 78 Motion for Appointment of Counsel, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 2/13/13. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 73 ORDER GRANTING 59 Motion to Serve Defendants by CM/ECF; ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Motion to Order Defendant to Depose Plaintiff by Written Questions or Video in Mexico and GRANTING Defendant's Request to Depose Plaintiff after Motion fo r Summary Judgment, If Necessary 61 , 63 , 67 ; ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Motion to Compel and Motion to Extend Discovery and Dispositive Motion Deadlines 60 , 62 , 64 , 68 , 68 , 69 , 70 ; ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of TIme to Respond to Motion for Summary Judgment, as premature 71 , signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 01/02/2013. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 58 ORDER FINDING Plaintiff's 55 Motion to Cancel Deposition MOOT for Review; ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's 49 52 54 57 Motion to Extend Discovery Deadline; REVISED Discovery Deadline: November 14, 2012; REVISED Dispositive Motion Deadline: January 24, 2013 signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 8/10/2012. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 48 ORDER granting 47 Motion for Extension of time to file responsive pleading signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 12/7/2011. (Filing Deadline: 1/25/2012). (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 37 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE For Failure to Comply With the Court's May 4, 2011 Screening Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 6/20/2011. Plaintiff must show cause OR file an amended complaint by 8/1/2011. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 24 ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 21 Motion for Approval of Authorization of Power of Attorney and Request to Utilize Electronic Filing; ORDER Striking Plaintiff's Notice of Change of Address signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 01/11/2011. Change of Address due by 2/14/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Change of Address)(Flores, E) |
Filing 14 ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Motions for Preliminary Injunction 8 , 9 signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 5/26/2010. (Verduzco, M) |
Filing 12 ORDER DENYING 11 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 05/17/2010. (Martin, S) |
Filing 10 ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Motion For Service Of The Complaint And Summons And Service Of Subsequent Papers (Doc. 7 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 4/21/2010. (Scrivner, E) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.