Rogers v. Vargas, et al.
Plaintiff: Charles A Rogers
Defendant: S. Ponce, L. Polk and B. Vargas
Case Number: 1:2009cv01027
Filed: June 11, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Fresno
Presiding Judge: Sandra M. Snyder
Presiding Judge: Sandra M. Snyder
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER Adopting 13 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DISMISSING, with Prejudice, Federal Claims for Failure to State a Claim and REMANDING Action to State Court for Consideration of any Remaining State Law Claims signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 7/22/2011. CASE CLOSED. Copy of remand order sent to Kings County Superior Court. (Sant Agata, S)
February 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 13 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that the 12 Federal Claims be Dismissed, with Prejudice, for Failure to State a Claim and the Action be Remanded to State Court for Consideration of any Remaining State Law Claims; Objections Due within Thirty Days signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 2/22/2011. Referred to Judge Anthony W. Ishii. Objections to F&R due by 3/28/2011. (Sant Agata, S)
January 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER Addressing Plaintiff's Notice to the Court 10 , signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 1/28/11: Amended Complaint due by 2/10/2011, or the federal causes of action will be dismissed, with prejudice, and the action will be remanded to state court. (Attachments: # 1 Amended Complaint Form)(Hellings, J)
January 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND, for Failure to State a Claim; Amended Complaint due by 2/10/2011, signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 01/07/2011. (Attachments: # 1 1983 Amended Complaint Form)(Flores, E)
July 31, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER GRANTING Request for Screening Order; ORDER GRANTING Extension of Time to File Response to 1 Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 7/31/2009. Response to Complaint due by 9/2/2009. (Sant Agata, S)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rogers v. Vargas, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charles A Rogers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S. Ponce
Represented By: Kenneth Robert Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: L. Polk
Represented By: Kenneth Robert Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: B. Vargas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?