Yang v. District Director of INS, et al.
| Dar Yang |
| District Director of Immigration and Naturalization Service, San Francisco, California and United States Immigration and Naturalization Service |
| 1:2009cv01195 |
| July 10, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kern |
| William M. Wunderlich |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
ORDER DISMISSING Petition Due to Petitioner's Failure to Follow a Court Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 7/16/10: The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED without prejudice; The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to dismiss all pending motions as MOOT; The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE why the 1 Petition should not be Dismissed for Petitioner's Failure to Prosecute signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 5/3/2010. Show Cause Response due by 6/29/2010.(Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER DENYING 3 Motion for Appointment of Counsel, Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 7/14/2009. (Arellano, S.)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER GRANTING 4 Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 7/13/2009. (Arellano, S.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
