Sarmas v. County of Stanislaus et al
Plaintiff: Valine Sarmas
Defendant: County of Stanislaus, Pedro Beltran and Adam Christianson
Case Number: 1:2009cv01333
Filed: July 29, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Fresno
Presiding Judge: Dennis L. Beck
Presiding Judge: Lawrence J. O'Neill
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 29, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER Discharging Order To Show Cause (Doc. 30 ); Order Setting Defendants' Response To Request For Leave, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/29/2011. (Fahrney, E)
March 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/23/2011 why sanctions should not be imposed. Show Cause Response due by 4/1/2011.(Lundstrom, T)
November 3, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER contining Pre-Trial dates; Non-Expert Discovery and Expert Disclosure due by 12/15/2010, Expert Discovery cut-off 1/7/2011 Dispositive Motions filed by 2/17/2011, Non-Dispositive Motions filed by 1/4/2011, Final Pretrial Conference set for 7/6/ 2011 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill, Jury Trial set for 9/6/2011 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill, Settlement Conference set for 2/10/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (MJS) before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 11/3/2010. (Kusamura, W)
August 10, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 19 STIPULATION and ORDER TO CONTINUE Settlement Conference from 8/10/2010 to 11/16/2010 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (DLB) before Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 8/9/2010. (Hernandez, M)
October 26, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER GRANTING In Part and Denying In Part 6 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; ORDERS Defendants, no later than November 6, 2009, to file and serve an answer to Ms. Sarmas' remaining claims, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 10/26/2009. (Case Management Deadline: 11/6/2009) (Martin, S)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sarmas v. County of Stanislaus et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Valine Sarmas
Represented By: John L. Burris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: County of Stanislaus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pedro Beltran
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Adam Christianson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?