Department of Fair Employment and Housing et al v. Corrections Corporation of America
| Department of Fair Employment and Housing and Shirley Darlene Chapman |
| Corrections Corporation of America |
| 1:2009cv01388 |
| August 6, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kern |
| Dennis L. Beck |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
ORDER to Reconsider Remand 26 signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/4/09. (Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER GRANTING 14 Motion to Remand, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 11/10/2009. Copy of remand order sent to Kern County Superior Court. (CASE REMANDED to Kern County Superior Court)(CASE CLOSED) (Martin, S)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER Continuing Mandatory Scheduling Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 10/2/2009. Scheduling Conference set for 12/9/2009 at 09:15 AM in Courtroom 9 (DLB) before Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck. (Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
12
STIPULATION and ORDER -GRANTED. 7 MOTION to STRIKE currently set for 9/17/09 has been CONTINUED to 11/17/2009 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4(LJO) before District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on August 27, 2009. (Lira, I)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
