Pfrommer et al v. R&D Media North Americas B.V. et al
| William Pfrommer and Michael Watson |
| R&D Media North Americas B.V. and Mblox, Inc. |
| 1:2009cv01442 |
| August 17, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Fresno |
| Gary S. Austin |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Defendant |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
ORDER To DISMISS And CLOSE ACTION, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/4/2011. This Court DISMISSES With Prejudice This Entire Action; VACATES All Pending Matters; and DIRECTS The Clerk to Close This Action. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER GRANTING a continuance of the stay through, and including, 1/6/2011, with a STATUS CONFERENCE set for that same day, at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 10 (GSA) before Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin; case management deadline set for 12/30/2010 for receipt of joint status report; order signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 9/13/2010. (Rooney, M)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER Extending Stay in Light of Joint Status Report of July 19,2010 signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 7/21/2010. Updated status report due on or before 9/8/2010. (Esteves, C)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER GRANTING the stipulation to stay litigation as to defendant R&D Media North America B.V. dba Glomobi Pending final approval of class action settlement (CASE STAYED through 7/23/2010). The Court further VACATES the Motion to Remand currently no ticed for 5/14/2010, document 20 , and the scheduling conference currently set for 6/2/2010. The parties are DIRECTED to file a status report by 7/19/2010 advising the Court of the status of the proposed class action settlement in Williams, Et A l., v. Motricity, Inc., Et Al. Status Conference set for 9/15/2010 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 10 (GSA) before Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin with a status conference report due by 9/8/2010; order signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 4/23/2010. (Rooney, M)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER GRANTING Stipulation to Dismiss Complaint Against Defendant MBLOX With Prejudice Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1), signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/10/10. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER Regarding Stipulation Concerning Hearing on Motion For Remand and Initial Scheduling Conference signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 3/8/2010. Initial Scheduling Conference is CONTINUED from 4/21/2010 to 6/2/2010 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 10 (GSA) before Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin; Motion For Remand Hearing is CONTINUED from 3/26/2010 to 5/14/2010 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 10 (GSA) before Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin. (Esteves, C)
|
|
Filing
27
STIPULATION and ORDER to Continue Hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 1/4/2010. Motion Hearing RESET FOR 3/26/2010 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 10 (GSA) before Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin. (Esteves, C)
|
|
Filing
23
STIPULATION and ORDER to Continue Hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand and to Continue Initial Scheduling Conference signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 11/6/2009. Motion Hearing RESET for 1/15/2010 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 10 (GSA) before Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin; Initial Scheduling Conference RESET for 3/12/2010 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 10 (GSA) before Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin. (Esteves, C)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
