O'Neal v. California Department of Corrections, et al.
Donnie Ray O'Neal, Jr |
California Department of Corrections, K. Allison, A. Enenmoh, G. Miller, T. Byers, R. Rottman and M. Crum |
1:2009cv01552 |
September 2, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Kings |
William M. Wunderlich |
None |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 41 ORDER DENYING Motion for Reimbursement of Funds re 40 signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 2/4/2015. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 34 ORDER DENYING 29 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration of Order Dismissing Second Amended Complaint With Prejudice and Judgment Entered Thereon signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 11/27/2012. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 27 ORDER Dismissing Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint 26 for Failure to State a Cognizable Claim, Clerk Shall Close the case, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 9/25/12. CASE CLOSED. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 16 ORDER DENYING Miscellaneous Motions re 10 Motion to Compel, 12 Motion for Injunction, 14 Motion for Reconsideration, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 1/10/2011. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 15 ORDER DENYING 13 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 5/27/2010. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 9 ORDER Denying 8 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 02/01/2010. (Flores, E) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.