Jones v. King et al
| Michael J. Jones |
| Theodore King and Scott Drewry |
| 1:2009cv02004 |
| November 16, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kern |
| Jennifer L. Thurston |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that the Third Amended Complaint be DISMISSED without leave to amend for failure to state claim matter referred to Judge O'Neill; signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 6/2/2010. Objections to F&R due by 6/21/2010 (Kusamura, W)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 4/14/2010. (Leon-Guerrero, A)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER WITHDRAWING F&R, ORDER REQUIRING CLERK TO FILE, and ORDER DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 3/30/2010. (Leon-Guerrero, A)
|
|
Filing
6
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that the action be dismissed with prejudice for failure to state claim re 1 Complaint filed by Michael J. Jones Matter referred to Judge O'Neill; signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 2/22/2010. Objections to F&R due by 3/8/2010(Kusamura, W)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER Granting 2 Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 11/19/2009. (Esteves, C)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
