Evans v. Sears Logistics Services, Inc. et al
| Randolph Evans |
| Sears Logistics Services, Inc., Sears, Roebuck & Co. and Sears Holding Corp. |
| 1:2009cv02055 |
| November 23, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Fresno |
| Sandra M. Snyder |
| Oliver W. Wanger |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
113
ORDER to DISMISS and to Close Action signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 03/09/2012. CASE CLOSED. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
111
ORDER as to Settlement, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/8/12: This Court ORDERS the parties, no later March 9, 2012, to file appropriate papers to dismiss or conclude this action in its entirety, or to show good cause why the action has not been dismissed. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
108
ORDER For Status Report, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/9/2011. (Status Report Deadline: 2/7/2012) (Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
107
ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 66 signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on December 8, 2011. (Munoz, I)
|
|
Filing
106
Stipulation By Parties To Mediate In Lieu Of November 16, 2011 Settlement Conference; ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 10/21/2011. (Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
103
ORDER signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 10/12/2011 regarding 66 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
99
STIPULATION and ORDER Vacating Date for Disclosure of Experts: dates for expert reports, rebuttal reports and expert discovery are herey vacated, to be reset when the dates for summary judgment and trial are reset. signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 9/28/2011. (Herman, H)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER Compelling Further Responses to (1) Plaintiff's First Request for Production of Documents; (2) Plaintiff's Second Request for Production of Documents 33 , 34 , 42 from a hearing held on 2/25/2011 61 before Judge Snyder, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 3/24/2011. (Herman, H)
|
|
Filing
49
STIPULATION and ORDER to Modify the Briefing Schedule for Plaintiff's Motions to Compel 32 , 33 , 34 RESET MOTION HEARING from 1/28/2011 to Friday, February 25, 2011 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 7 (SMS) before Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder. signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 12/21/2010. (Herman, H)
|
|
Filing
45
STIPULATION and ORDER Regarding Testimony of Mallory Burns, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 11/19/2010. (Gaumnitz, R)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER Regarding Financial Condition Documents and Witnesses signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 9/13/2010. (Esteves, C)
|
|
Filing
20
STIPULATION and ORDER Amending Scheduling Conference Order as To The Dates For FIling Dispositive Motions, Disclosing Expert Witnesses, And Completing Expert Discovery, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 6/2/2010. (It is hereby ordered that the Courts Scheduling Conference Order, entered into on March 31, 2010, be modified as follows: December 8, 2010 will be deadline for the filing of all Dispositive Pre-Trial Motions, January 28, 2011 will be the deadline for disclosing all expert witnesses, and February 18, 2011 will be the deadline for completing all expert discovery. In all other respects, the Scheduling Conference Order remains the same.) (Gaumnitz, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
