Gonzalez v. Cate et al
| Zacarias Gonzalez |
| Matthew Cate, James D. Hartley and Guinn |
| 1:2009cv02149 |
| November 30, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kings |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Gary S. Austin |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that this Action be DISMISSED With Prejudice Based on Plaintiff's Failure to Obey the Court's Order of August 29, 2012 and Failure to Prosecute this Action re 16 First Amended Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 10/12/2012. Referred to Judge O'Neill. Objections to F&R due within thirty (30) days. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
51
SUMMARY JUDGMENT NOTICE-WARNING; ORDER REQUIRING Plaintiff to File Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to Defendant Guinn's 46 Motion for Summary Judgment; Thirty Day Deadline signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 8/29/2012. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER DENYING 31 Motion for Summary Judgment ORDERR ADOPTING 45 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 08/22/2012. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Complaint 32 ; ORDER Striking Lodged Second Amended Complaint 34 , signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 7/26/12. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
45
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS re 31 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 7/11/12. Referred to Judge O'Neill; Objections due in twenty days. (Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER Denying Motion To Designate Plaintiff's Brother As Attorney-Of-Fact (Doc. 42 ), ORDER For Plaintiff To File Status Report And Notice Of Change Of Address Within Sixty Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 3/23/2012. (Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER GRANTING Motion to Modify Discovery Scheduling Order 40 ; ORDER EXTENDING Discovery Deadline for Limited Purpose Discussed in This Order; ORDER EXTENDING Dispositive Motions Deadline for All Parties to This Action, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 3/5/12: New Discovery Cut-Off Date: 05/06/2012; New Dispositive Motions Deadline: 07/14/2012. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER Granting Defendant Guinn's Motion for Leave to Depose Plaintiff By Video Conference 37 , signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 2/7/12. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER Adopting 17 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ORDER for this Action to Proceed on 16 First Amended Complaint against Defendant Guinn for Failure to Protect, and DISMISSING all other Claims and Defendants signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/24/2011. Matthew Cate and James D. Hartley terminated. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
17
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 1/4/2011 recommending that certain claims and Defendants be dismissed. Referred to Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill; Objections to F&R due by 2/7/2011. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER Denying Motion For Appointment Of Counsel (Doc. 13 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 3/4/2010. (Scrivner, E)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:09-cv-3301 GGH) to Fresno (1:09-cv-2149 GSA) signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/10/09. (Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
