Coleman v. CDCR et al
Robert Coleman |
CDCR, Director Of Corrections, Deputy Director, Health Care Services Division, D. Adams and Wong |
1:2009cv02192 |
December 17, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Kings |
Sandra M. Snyder |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 ORDER DENYING 20 Motion for Reconsideration, With Prejudice, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 7/26/2011. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 19 ORDER Denying Motion For Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 18 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 7/15/2011. (Fahrney, E) |
Filing 13 ORDER DENYING 12 Motion for Reconsideration of Dismissal of CDCR, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 3/10/2011. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 10 ORDER Granting 9 Motion to Dismiss ADA and RA Claims; Denying Motion for Counsel; Dismissing CDCR, Official Capacity Claims for Damages, and Section 845.6 Claim; and Dismissing Complaint with Leave to Amend Eighth Amendment Claim signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 02/10/2011. Amended Complaint due by 3/17/2011; CDCR terminated from action. (Attachments: # 1 1983 Amended Complaint Form)(Flores, E) |
Filing 4 ORDER to Submit Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis or Pay Filing Fee Within 45 Days signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 12/23/2009. Motion for IFP/Filing Fee due by 2/8/2010. (Sant Agata, S) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.