Tulare District Healthcare System v. The Dow Chemical Company et al
Tulare District Healthcare System |
The Dow Chemical Company and Dow Roofing Systems, LLC |
1:2009cv02206 |
December 17, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Tulare |
Dennis L. Beck |
Anthony W. Ishii |
Contract Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 ORDER that plaintiff may file an Amended Complaint, deemed filed effective 1/19/2010. It is hereby further orderded that upon filing the Amended Complaint this action shall be remanded to the Tulare County Superior Court. Defendants shall file a responsive pleading to plaintiff's amended complaint within 30 days from the date of the Tulare County Superior Court's receipt of the order for remand signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 1/25/2010. (Hernandez, M) |
Filing 10 ORDER Regarding Ex Parte Application for an Order Shortening Time for Hearing on Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint and for Remand to Tulare County Superior Court signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 1/5/2010. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: The hearing on Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint and for Remand to Tulare County Superior Court will proceed on shortened notice on January 22, 2010, at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom #9 before Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck. (Bradley, A) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.