Camarena v. Diep et al
| Jesse Camarena |
| Joan Diep, Marshall S. Lewis, Pleasant Valley State Prison and James A. Yates |
| 1:2010cv00025 |
| January 6, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Fresno |
| Gary S. Austin |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
ORDER Granting Defendant's 29 Motion to Dismiss Action, without Prejudice, for Failure to Prosecute signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 11/06/2012. CASE CLOSED. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER Requiring Plaintiff to File Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to Defendant's 29 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Prosecute signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 10/04/2012. Opposition due by 10/29/2012. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER Granting Defendant's 27 Motion for Extension of Time to Obtain Plaintiff's Responses to Discovery and File a Motion to Compel signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 08/10/2012. Discovery due by 9/6/2012. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER Discharging Order to Show Cause 8 , signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 4/7/11. (Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE why action should not be dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 2/8/2011. Show Cause Response due by 3/14/2011.(Lundstrom, T)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
