Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Gonzales, et al
| Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. |
| Steven Melendez Gonzales and Wendy M. Raygoza |
| 1:2010cv00134 |
| January 27, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kings |
| Dennis L. Beck |
| Oliver W. Wanger |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 553 Unauthorized Reception of Cable Service |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
STIPULATION and ORDER to continue the Settlement Conference from 7/11/2011 to 8/9/2011 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 9 (DLB) before Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck. Pursuant to the Local Rules, the settlement conference statement should be submitted one week before the conference. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 7/7/2011. (Hernandez, M)
|
|
Filing
24
MEMORANDUM DECISION Permitting Supplemental Briefing Re 21 Motion For Appointment of Receiver, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 6/13/2011. (Plaintiff shall supplement its motion for appointment of a receiver as described above on or before 6/27/2011. Upon receipt of Plaintiffs supplemental filing, the motion shall be submitted for decision.)(Gaumnitz, R)
|
|
Filing
15
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS regarding 12 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION for DEFAULT JUDGMENT filed by Joe Hand Promotions, Inc - referred to Judge Wanger; Order signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 8/16/2010. (Hernandez, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
